Destruction, Narrative and the Excess of Uniqueness: Reading Cavarero on Violence and Narration

Critical Horizons 19 (2):157-172 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I critically engage Adriana Cavarero’s account of uniqueness via an analysis of her work on narrativity and violence. I suggest there is an ambivalence in Cavarero’s account of uniqueness: Cavarero argues both that uniqueness is susceptible to destruction, and that it cannot finally be annihilated. To make this clear I use Cavarero’s account to read a narrative offered by Miklós Nyiszli, of a woman who survived an Auschwitz gas chamber. I contrast this to Cavarero’s reading of Eurydice and Orpheus, arguing that the ambivalence in Cavarero’s account can be resolved by thinking an excess proper to uniqueness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Horrorism in the scene of torture: reading Scarry with Cavarero.Timothy Huzar - 2017 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Video Studies 2 (1):25-43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-28

Downloads
24 (#645,728)

6 months
9 (#436,568)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Politicizing Theory.Adriana Cavarero - 2002 - Political Theory 30 (4):506-532.
Modernity and the Holocaust, or, Listening to Eurydice.Julia Hell - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (6):125-154.
Politicizing theory.Adriana Cavarero - 2004 - In Stephen K. White & J. Donald Moon (eds.), What is political theory? Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Bracha’s Eurydice.Judith Butler - 2004 - Theory, Culture and Society 21 (1):95-100.

Add more references