Modular argumentation for modelling legal doctrines of performance relief

Argument and Computation 1 (1):47-69 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present an argument-based formalism of contract dispute resolution following a modern view that the court would resolve a contract dispute by enforcing an interpretation of contract that reasonably represents the mutual intention of contract parties. Legal doctrines provide principles, rules and guidelines for the court to objectively arrive at such an interpretation. In this paper, we establish the appropriateness of the formalism by applying it to resolve disputes about performance relief with the legal doctrines of impossibility and frustration of purpose in common laws of contract. The formalism is based on modular argumentation, a recently proposed extension of assumption-based argumentation for modelling contract dispute resolution

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,635

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal Practices and the Reason of the Law.Kurt Nutting - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (1):111-133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
63 (#187,390)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

H. Nguyen
Northwestern University