Tarski and Proper Classes

Analysis 40 (4):6-11 (1980)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper the authors argue that if Tarski’s definition of truth for the calculus of classes is correct, then set theories which assert the existence of proper classes (classes which are not the member of anything) are incorrect.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tarski and proper classes.Philip Hugly & Alonso Church - 1980 - Analysis 40 (4):205-207.
Proper classes via the iterative conception of set.Mark F. Sharlow - 1987 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):636-650.
The Set Theory of Proper Classes.Joel Irwin Friedman - 1966 - Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
Counting Proper Classes.James Robert Brown - 1980 - Analysis 40 (3):123 - 126.
Finite sequences of classes.Raphael M. Robinson - 1945 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):125-126.
Sets and classes as many.John L. Bell - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
On the iterative explanation of the paradoxes.Christopher Menzel - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-12

Downloads
163 (#24,626)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references