Gun Rights as Deontic Constraints

Social Theory and Practice 45 (4):601-612 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In earlier work, I argued that gun prohibition is unjustified because it violates an individual right to self-defense. Here, I defend that argument against objections posed by Nicholas Dixon and Jeff McMahan to the effect that the right of citizens to be free from gun violence counterbalances the right of self-defense, and that gun prohibition does not violate the right of self-defense because it renders everyone overall safer.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self‐defense, claim‐rights, and guns.Chetan Cetty - 2024 - The Philosphical Forum 55 (1):27-46.
Is There a Right to Own a Gun?Michael Huemer - 2003 - Social Theory and Practice 29 (2):297-324.
Handguns, Philosophers, and the Right to Self-Defense.Nicholas Dixon - 2011 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):151-170.
Gun Bans, Risk, and Self-Defense.Deane-Peter Baker - 2014 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):235-249.
The Moral Case for Gun Ownership.Tim Hsiao - forthcoming - In Bob Fischer (ed.), Ethics, Left and Right: The Moral Issues that Divide Us. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Against Gun Bans and Restrictive Licensing.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (2):180-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-05

Downloads
115 (#159,412)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Huemer
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

Self‐defense, claim‐rights, and guns.Chetan Cetty - 2024 - The Philosphical Forum 55 (1):27-46.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references