Did Alex have Language?

Etica E Politica 11 (1):271-290 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the utterances made by the renowned talking parrot, Alex, were not only meaningful and sincere, they counted as a language. Three arguments are considered in favor of this claim: 1) Alex demonstrated the capacity for recursion, 2) Alex satised the Davidsonian requirements for a talking entity to have language, and 3) Alex satised the Searlean requirements for making speech acts. The paper concludes that the pieces of human language that Alex most readily acquired and those pieces that he lacked might point out a kind of evolutionary path by which our ancestors acquired the language that we now speak

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talking with Alex.William Timberlake - 2003 - Semiotica 2003 (146):439-471.
Alex.Laurence A. Rickels - 1990 - American Journal of Semiotics 7 (3):53-61.
Language and Metaphor in Indian Stotra literature.Ram Karan Sharma - 1993 - In Alex Wayman & Rāma Karaṇa Śarmā (eds.), Researches in Indian and Buddhist philosophy: essays in honour of Professor Alex Wayman. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers. pp. 227-240.
Transparency and Self-Knowledge, by Alex Byrne. [REVIEW]Sarah K. Paul - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (3):480-484.
Review of Alex Hyslop's "Other Minds". [REVIEW]Andrew Melnyk - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):383-384.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references