Potentiality in Biology

In K. Engelhardt & M. Quante (eds.), Handbook of Potentiality. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 401-428 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We take the potentialities that are studied in the biological sciences (e.g., totipotency) to be an important subtype of biological dispositions. The goal of this paper is twofold: first, we want to provide a detailed understanding of what biological dispositions are. We claim that two features are essential for dispositions in biology: the importance of the manifestation process and the diversity of conditions that need to be satisfied for the disposition to be manifest. Second, we demonstrate that the concept of a disposition (or potentiality) is a very useful tool for the analysis of the explanatory practice in the biological sciences. On the one hand it allows an in-depth analysis of the nature and diversity of the conditions under which biological systems display specific behaviors. On the other hand the concept of a disposition may serve a unificatory role in the philosophy of the natural sciences since it captures not only the explanatory practice of biology, but of all natural sciences. Towards the end we will briefly come back to the notion of a potentiality in biology.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dispositions and Potentialities.Jennifer McKitrick - 2014 - In John Lizza (ed.), Potentiality: Metaphysical and Bioethical Dimensions. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univerity Press. pp. 49-68.
Causation, Laws and Dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 2007 - In Max Kistler & Bruno Gnassounou (eds.), Dispositions and Causal Powers. Ashgate.
evoText: A new tool for analyzing the biological sciences.Grant Ramsey & Charles H. Pence - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:83-87.
Evo-devo: a science of dispositions.Christopher J. Austin - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2):373-389.
Dispositions.Felipe Romero & Carl Craver - 2015 - In Robin L. Cautin & Scott O. Lilienfeld (eds.), The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. Wiley-Blackwell.
Dispositions.Shungho Choi & Michael Fara - 2012 - The Standford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Lessons from biology for philosophy of the human sciences.Alex Rosenberg - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (1):3-19.
Dispositions: A Debate.Tim Crane, D. M. Armstrong & C. B. Martin - 1996 - New York: Routledge. Edited by C. B. Martin, U. T. Place & Tim Crane.
Laws and dispositions.Andreas Hüttemann - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (1):121-135.
Dispositions and normal conditions.Jan Hauska - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 139 (2):219 - 232.
Dispositions and habituals.Michael Fara - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):43–82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
475 (#40,094)

6 months
77 (#62,715)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Andreas Hüttemann
University of Cologne
Marie I. Kaiser
Bielefeld University

References found in this work

New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Nature's capacities and their measurement.Nancy Cartwright - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties.Alexander Bird - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Thinking about mechanisms.Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Stephen Mumford.

View all 35 references / Add more references