"Third generation" ethics: what careproviders should do before they do ethics

Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (1):3-13 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author suggests that a “first generation” task in bioethics is to give patients the information they need; a “second generation” task is to do this in the most effective way; and a “third generation” task is to avoid harming patients by imposing value biases. The author discusses ways to pursue this third generation task.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Naturalized Clinical Ethics.Marian Verkerk & Hilde Lindemann - 2012 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (4):289-306.
Should careproviders go ethically "off label"?Edmund G. Howe - 2008 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 20 (4):291-298.
Individuals, Systems, and Professional Behavior.Evan G. DeRenzo - 2006 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 17 (3):275-288.
The nurse under physician authority: commentary.L. Raeve - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):228-229.
The best place for bare-knuckled ethics.Edmund G. Howe - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):3-10.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
7 (#1,406,036)

6 months
1 (#1,722,083)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

E. Howe
San Diego State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references