Unity and disunity in landmarks: The rivalry between Petr Struve and Mikhail gershenzon

Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):61-78 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article the most important text of twentieth-century Russian intellectual history, Landmarks (Vekhi) (1909) comes under reexamination. Looking at the rivalry of the volume''s two organizers, Mikhail Gershenzon and Petr Struve, Professor Brian Horowitz explains why Landmarks succeeded in offering such a biting critique of radical ideology, while lacking its own internal intellectual unity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific Practice and the Disunity of Physics.Andreas Hüttemann - 1998 - Philosophia Naturalis 35 (1):209-222.
Learning from disunity.Jennifer Radden - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (4):357-359.
The appearance of unity: A higher-order interpretation of the unity of consciousness.Josh Weisberg - 2001 - Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society.
Landmarks.P. P. Gaidenko - 1993 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):16-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#633,346)

6 months
1 (#1,471,540)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references