Science nominalized properly

Philosophy of Science 54 (2):281-282 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although Hale and Resnik are correct in their specific objection to my proposal for nominalizing science, the proposal can be saved by means of a simple and plausible modification

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science nominalized?Susan C. Hale & Michael D. Resnik - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):277-280.
Horgan on sleeping beauty.Joel Pust - 2008 - Synthese 160 (1):97 - 101.
Précis: Interdisciplinary Foundations.Cecilea Mun - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy of Emotion 5 (1):1-10.
Horgan and Tienson on ceteris paribus laws.Marcello Guarini - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.
A neglected proposal concerning simplicity.Robert Ackermann - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (3):228-235.
Illegitimate Values, Confirmation Bias, and Mandevillian Cognition in Science.Uwe Peters - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (4):1061-1081.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
212 (#13,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terry Horgan
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Between Mathematics and Physics.Michael D. Resnik - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):368-378.
Counterfactuals and the applications of mathematics.Stuart Cornwell - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 66 (1):73 - 87.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science nominalized.Terence Horgan - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):529-549.
Science nominalized?Susan C. Hale & Michael D. Resnik - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (2):277-280.

Add more references