Group Oughts

In John Horty (ed.), Agency and deontic logic. New York: Oxford University Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The notion of what an agent ought to do is generalized to yield a notion of what groups of agents ought to do. Relations among the obligations governing groups and subgroups are explored, as well as the connections among different species of individual act utilitarianism, group act utilitarianism, and rule utilitarianism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-25

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Horty
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references