‘Nobody could possibly misunderstand what a group is’: a study in early twentieth-century group axiomatics

Archive for History of Exact Sciences 71 (5):409-481 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the early years of the twentieth century, the so-called ‘postulate analysis’—the study of systems of axioms for mathematical objects for their own sake—was regarded by some as a vital part of the efforts to understand those objects. I consider the place of postulate analysis within early twentieth-century mathematics by focusing on the example of a group: I outline the axiomatic studies to which groups were subjected at this time and consider the changing attitudes towards such investigations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Synesthesia in the twentieth century.Richard E. Cytowic - 2013 - In Julia Simner & Edward Hubbard (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford University Press. pp. 399.
heresy-hammering, Group Selection, And Epistemic Responsibility.Ronnie Hawkins - 2008 - Florida Philosophical Review 8 (1):189-212.
The modern confessional: Anglo-American religious groups and the emergence of lay psychotherapy1.Alison Falby - 2003 - Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 39 (3):251--267.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-26

Downloads
8 (#1,310,468)

6 months
2 (#1,192,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?