Interpreting Acts

Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (3):245-258 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Interpreters of Acts face three recurrent questions: 1) What is its genre? 2) Why was it written? and 3) How is Scripture used? In deciding genre, readers must decide if Acts is history, and, if so, in what sense. Determining its literary or theological purpose can be done in terms of asking what Acts accomplishes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Re: the rhetic.Martin Kaså & Felix Larsson - 2023 - Synthese 202 (2).
On Knowing What to Say: Planning Speech Acts.Philip Raymond Cohen - 1978 - Dissertation, University of Toronto
Material Differences Between History And Nature.Andrew P. Porter - 2004 - International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):185-200.
Acts 2:1–21.Jenny McDevitt - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (1):70-73.
Speech Acts.Mitchell S. Green - 2010 - In Timothy O'Connor & Constantine Sandis (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 58–66.
Aristotle's painful path to virtue.Howard J. Curzer - 2002 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 40 (2):141-162.
Acts 11:1–18.Russell Morton - 2012 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 66 (3):309-311.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
3 (#1,734,397)

6 months
3 (#1,209,684)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations