Чудо і надприродне в євангельському наративі: Апологетична позиція професора київської духовної академії дмитра богдашевського

Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 4:30-39 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, the author carries on his research into works by Dmytro Bohdashevskyi, the famous Professor and Rector of the Kyiv Theological Academy in the early 20th century. The paper covers Dmytro Bohdashevskyi’s theological apologetics of the miracle and the supernatural in biblical narrative. It was established that Kyiv researcher realized the synthesis of epistemological, hermeneutic, dogmatic and religious-practical components in his position. Great attention is paid to his peculiar religious phenomenology, epistemology and praxeology of the Gospel miracles. Bohdashevskyi proposed a phenomenological representation of wonderful events in the acts of life experience. Religious structures such as experiencing the miraculous and experiencing the meeting the Absolute play the most important role. The epistemological basis of Bohdashevskyi ‘s reasoning about miracle in the Bible is the affirmation of its coherence with the human mind. This coherence is based on the act of religious faith in which a sacred rationalization of a miracle takes place. This way of rationalizing Gospel miracles objectively opposes both the primitive magical and the modern rationalistic interpretations of the miraculous. However, the Kyiv apologist sometimes finds himself vulnerable to denying the significance of the act of faith and moving beyond the theological discursiveness to which his rationalist-minded opponents resort. The researcher objectively describes the assumption of the miracle as an intrinsically problematic cognitive act, demonstrating the complexity of human cognition as one of the underlying reasons for the emergence and existence of religion. In this way, D. Bohdashevskyi came very close to the comparison of scientific and extra-scientific knowledge, rational and extra-rational components of cognitive process. Article received 15.08.2019

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Дмитро поспєхов: Філософ, психолог, богослов.Maryna Tkachuk - 2021 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 7:3-16.
Кандидатські твори студентів київської духовної академії : Специфіка жанру.Maryna Tkachuk - 2019 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 3:3-14.
On the way to the Christian-Jewish dialogue (based on the materials published in “Kyiv Theological Academy Studies” journal (1860–1917)).Vadym Menzhulin - 2018 - Наукові Записки Наукма. Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 1:65-78.
Dmytro Pospiekhov: Philosopher, Psychologist, Theologist (to the 200th Anniversary).Maryna Tkachuk - 2021 - Наукові Записки Наукма: Філософія Та Релігієзнавство 7:3–16.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-10

Downloads
7 (#603,698)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations