Encuneral noun phrases

Abstract

The semantics of noun phrases (NPs) is of crucial importance for both philosophy and linguistics. Throughout much of the history of the debate about the semantics of noun phrases there has been an implicit assumption about how they are to be understood. Basically, it is the assumption that NPs come only in two kinds. In this paper we would like to make that assumption explicit and discuss it and its status in the semantics of natural language. We will have a look at how the assumption is to be understood more precisely, what its methodological status should be, whether it has been abandoned in recent work in semantics, and whether it should be abandoned in future work. To do all this, it’s best to start with some historical context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-03-19

Downloads
56 (#281,081)

6 months
1 (#1,506,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Hofweber
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Citations of this work

Inexpressible properties and propositions.Thomas Hofweber - 2008 - In Dean W. Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 155-206.

Add more citations

References found in this work

General semantics.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Synthese 22 (1-2):18--67.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
.Ernest LePore & Brian P. McLaughlin (eds.) - 1985 - Blackwell.

View all 40 references / Add more references