- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Humbert, David. Violence in the Films of Alfred Hitchcock: A Study in Mimesis.George A. Dunn - 2017 - Philosophical Journal of Conflict and Violence 1 (2).
Critical Thinking: A Guide to Evaluating Information David Hitchcock Toronto: Methuen, 1983. Pp. xiv, 283. $16.95. [REVIEW]Michael A. Gilbert - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (3):559-.
Hitchcock and philosophy: Dial M for metaphysics edited by Baggett, David , and William A. drumin.Lisa K. Broad - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):212–214.
Festschrift for Peter Parsons. D. Obbink, R. Rutherford culture in pieces. Essays on ancient texts in honour of Peter Parsons. Pp. XVIII + 342, ills, b/w & colour pls. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2011. Cased, £93, us$155. Isbn: 978-0-19-929201-1. [REVIEW]Maryline Parca - 2015 - The Classical Review 65 (2):319-321.
David Hitchcock, On Reasoning and Argument. Essays in Informal Logic and on Critical Thinking. [REVIEW]Gabriela Bašić Hanžek - 2020 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):257-261.
Violence in the Films of Alfred Hitchcock: A Study in Mimesis by David Humbert. [REVIEW]William E. Cain - 2019 - The Bulletin of the Colloquium on Violence and Religion 59:10-15.
Distinctive features of persuasion and deliberation dialogues.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon & Douglas Walton - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (2):105-127.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
24 (#155,087)
6 months
9 (#1,260,759)
2015-04-02
Downloads
24 (#155,087)
6 months
9 (#1,260,759)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij (eds.) - 2006 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
Consensuar y disentir en un modelo de democracia contestataria.María G. Navarro - 2016 - Revista de Filosofía Conceptos 8:110-127.
References found in this work
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
Dialectics: a controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
A formulation of the simple theory of types.Alonzo Church - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):56-68.
A Formulation of the Simple Theory of Types.Alonzo Church - 1940 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 5 (3):114-115.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-2nz2h uwo