Razón y experiencia: El debate McDowell-Dreyfus

Análisis Filosófico 34 (2):203-227 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

En el siguiente artículo se expone un análisis crítico de la obra Mind, Reason and Beingin-the-world: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, editada por Josep K. Schear. Primero se ofrecerá una sucinta introducción a las propuestas filosóficas de ambos autores para dar cuenta de la percepción y su relación con la racionalidad. Tras esto se evaluarán los dos argumentos de Dreyfus contra la tesis principal de McDowell según la cual no hay solución de continuidad entre la experiencia y la razón, con especial atención a las nociones de contenido perceptivo y acceso epistémico de la experiencia que ambos autores manejan.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.36446/af.2014.55

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Joseph K. Schear (ed.) , Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate . Reviewed by.Carl Sachs - 2014 - Philosophy in Review 34 (3-4):167-170.
Joseph Schear : Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: The McDowell–Dreyfus debate: New York: Routledge, 2013, ISBN: 0415485878, $39.95.Eric J. Mohr - 2014 - Continental Philosophy Review 47 (2):239-242.
Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, edited by Joseph Schear.Peter Dennis - 2015 - Mind 124 (494):683-688.
Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: the McDowell-Dreyfus debate.Joseph K. Schear (ed.) - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
McDowell and Dreyfus on Unreflective Action.Erik Rietveld - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):183-207.
Self, Action and Passivity.Tony Cheng - 2015 - Philosophical Writings 44 (1):01-19.
Unreflective action and the argument from speed.Gabriel Gottlieb - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):338-362.
Rationality and Engagement: McDowell, Dreyfus and Zidane.Nicholas H. Smith - 2013 - Hegel Bulletin 34 (2):159-180.
Joseph K. Schear , Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate.Massimiliano Cappuccio - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (2):423-431.
Joseph K. Schear , Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate.: Routledge, 2013, 350 pp., ISBN 9780415485876. [REVIEW]Andrew Buskell - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (2):423-431.
Quietism or Description? McDowell in Dispute with Dreyfus.Kevin M. Cahill - 2014 - Review of Metaphysics 68 (2):395-409.
Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate, edited by Joseph K. Schear.Charles Macmillan Urban - 2016 - Mind 125 (500):1222-1227.
Review of Mind, reason, and being-in-the-world: The McDowell-Dreyfus debate. [REVIEW]Tom Strong - 2015 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 35 (2):140-142.
¿Es relevante el debate sobre los contenidos conceptuales de estados de percepción para el debate sobre la carga teórica de la observación?Julián A. Sánchez - 2016 - In Olga Lucía Gómez & Jairo Isaac Racines (eds.), En los limites de la ciencia y la filosofía. Cali: Universidad del Valle. pp. 127-142.
Mind, body, and world: Todes and McDowell on bodies and language.Joseph Rouse - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):38-61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-23

Downloads
13 (#1,036,774)

6 months
2 (#1,198,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Manuel Heras Escribano
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

Are affordances normative?Manuel Heras-Escribano & Manuel de Pinedo - 2016 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (4):565-589.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references