The More Things Change, the More They Remain the Same

Metaphilosophy 5 (1):1-17 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-9973.1974.tb00516.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The more things change, the more they remain the same.Donald F. Henze - 1974 - Metaphilosophy 5 (1):1–17.
Banishing risk: Or the more things change the more they remain the same.Charles E. Rosenberg - 1995 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 39 (1):28-42.
The More Things Change, the More Some Things Stay the Same.Donald R. Cohodes - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
The Nonduality of Motion and Rest: Sengzhao on the Change of Things.Chien-Hsing Ho - 2018 - In Youru Wang & Sandra A. Wawrytko (eds.), Dao Companion to Chinese Buddhist Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 175-188.
The more things change the more things change: Alan Love, : Conceptual change in biology: scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. Dordrecht: Springer, 490pp, $179 HB. [REVIEW]Leonard Finkelman - 2015 - Metascience 24 (3):409-412.
On a paradox of mereological change.Marjorie S. Price - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 54 (1):109 - 124.
Occupy Consciousness: Reading the 1960s and Occupy Wall Street with Herbert Marcuse.Peter Marcuse - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (2):481-489.
Time for a change : a polemic against the presentism/eternalism debate.Lawrence B. Lombard - 2006 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O’Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. MIT Press.
Philosophy of Change Management.S. K. Singh - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 29:157-163.
Desire.Philip Pettit - 1998 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
why Can't We Dispense With The Subject-predicate Form Without Losing Something More?Xiaoqiang Han - 2009 - Florida Philosophical Review 9 (2):79-89.
Occupy Consciousness.Peter Marcuse - 2013 - Radical Philosophy Review 16 (2):481-489.
Why Cannot We Dispense with the Subject-Predicate Form without Losing Something More?Xiaoqiang Han - 2009 - Florida Philosophy Review 9 (2):79-89.
Dreyfus and Spinosa on things-in-themselves.T. L. S. Sprigge - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):115 – 124.
Appendix one.Nicholas Kempf - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
12 (#1,082,941)

6 months
3 (#969,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references