Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as typologically determinative

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1):1-8 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.08.001

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Classes of Copenhagen interpretations: Mechanisms of collapse as typologically determinative.James R. Henderson - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41 (1):1-8.
Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony by James T. Cushing.B. J. Hiley - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):299-305.
Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony by James T. Cushing.B. J. Hiley - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 28 (2):299-305.
the Copenhagen interpretation.Peres A. Karl Popper - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):23-3.
Copenhagen computation.N. David Mermin - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):511-522.
Karl Popper and the Copenhagen interpretation.Asher Peres - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (1):23-34.
What's left for the neo-Copenhagen theorist.Michael Dascal - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72:310-321.
Revised Proof of the Uniqueness Theorem for ‘No Collapse’ Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub, Rob Clifton & Sheldon Goldstein - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (1):95-98.
Finding your marbles in wavefunction collapse theories.Daniel Parker - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (4):607-620.
Modal interpretations, decoherence and measurements.Guido Bacciagaluppi & Meir Hemmo - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (3):239-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
41 (#377,675)

6 months
4 (#1,004,663)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Niels Bohr on the wave function and the classical/quantum divide.Henrik Zinkernagel - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 53:9-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Von Neumann's argument for the projection postulate.Joseph D. Sneed - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):22-39.
That Von Neumann did not believe in a physical collapse.Lon Becker - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):121-135.
Heisenberg and the transformation of Kantian philosophy.Kristian Camilleri - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):271 – 287.

Add more references