Reflection of Long Game Formulas

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (3):381-392 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study game formulas the truth of which is determined by a semantical game of uncountable length. The main theme is the study of principles stating reflection of these formulas in various admissible sets. This investigation leads to two weak forms of strict-II11 reflection . We show that admissible sets such as H and Lω2 which fail to have strict-II11 reflection, may or may not, depending on set-theoretic hypotheses satisfy one or both of these weaker forms

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Forcing Approach to Strict‐II11 Reflection and Strict‐II11 = ∑01.W. Richard Stark - 1978 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 24 (25‐30):467-479.
Logics and algebras for multiple players.Loes Olde Loohuis & Yde Venema - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):485-519.
On the rules of intermediate logics.Rosalie Iemhoff - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (5):581-599.
A Forcing Approach to Strict-II11 Reflection and Strict-II11 = ∑01.W. Richard Stark - 1978 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 24 (25-30):467-479.
Barwise: Infinitary logic and admissible sets.H. Jerome Keisler & Julia F. Knight - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):4-36.
Partiality and games: propositional logic.G. Sandu & A. Pietarinen - 2001 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (1):101-121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
16 (#934,417)

6 months
3 (#1,046,495)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jouko A Vaananen
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations