The three arrows of Zeno

Synthese 107 (2):271 - 292 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We explore the better known paradoxes of Zeno including modern variants based on infinite processes, from the point of view of standard, classical analysis, from which there is still much to learn (especially concerning the paradox of division), and then from the viewpoints of non-standard and non-classical analysis (the logic of the latter being intuitionist).The standard, classical or Cantorian notion of the continuum, modeled on the real number line, is well known, as is the definition of motion as the time derivative of distance (we are not concerned with position and motion in more than one dimension, since Zeno wasn't). The real number line consists of its points, the distance between distinct points being positive and finite. The standard, classical derivative relies on the classical notion of limit, which does not use infinitesimals.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
78 (#213,340)

6 months
6 (#520,934)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Impossibility of Superfeats.Michael B. Burke - 2000 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):207-220.
Moving Without Being Where You’re Not; A Non-Bivalent Way.Constantin Antonopoulos - 2004 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 35 (2):235-259.
The Tortoise is Faster.Constantin Antonopoulos - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):491-510.
Einstein’s “true” discontinuity: With an application to Zeno.Constantin Antonopoulos - 2009 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 23 (3):339-349.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations