The Kantian case against democracy

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (2):243-250 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contrary to what Cordelli argues, the relationship between Kantian legitimacy and democratic decision-making is contingent rather than necessary. This paper counters the connection between Kantian legitimacy and democracy in three ways: by arguing that democratic authorization is (i) not necessary, (ii) not sufficient, and indeed may be (iii) detrimental to, legitimate governance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Kantian Case Against Torture.Peter Brian Barry - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (4):593-621.
e-Democracy: Rethinking Democracy Under ICT’s Light.Henry Flantrmsky - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 64:17-21.
Kantian and Utilitarian Democracy.David A. Lloyd Thomas - 1980 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):395 - 413.
Real-Time Democracy.Shane Ryan - 2016 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (2):301-312.
The myth of the myth of the rational voter.David Colander - 2008 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 20 (3):259-271.
Pragmatist politics: making the case for liberal democracy.John McGowan - 2012 - Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
What is special about democracy?Gordon Graham - 1983 - Mind 92 (365):94-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-20

Downloads
18 (#811,325)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case Against Privatization.Avihay Dorfman & Alon Harel - 2013 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (1):67-102.

Add more references