The impossibility of ‘possible’ worlds

Philosophy 74 (1):5-28 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The gist of these objections to the possible world account of necessity is that, for it to be true, ‘possible’ would have to be a name for an attribute. But to say that something is possible is not to describe it, but to say that there could be such a thing. And possibilities are not classes of entities. Possible worlds have been described as ways, but a way of getting to London from Cambridge is not an entity, and that there is a way is entailed by facts such as that if you travel south along the M3, you will get there.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
94 (#181,875)

6 months
3 (#967,057)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

New aspects of the probabilistic evaluation of hypotheses and experience.Rainer Gottlob - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):147 – 163.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references