Sir Mark Potter And The Protection Of The Traditional Family: Why Same Sex Marriage Is (Still) A Feminist Issue [Book Review]

Feminist Legal Studies 15 (2):223-234 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Wilkinson v. Kitzinger, the petitioner (Susan Wilkinson) sought a declaration of her marital status, following her marriage to Celia Kitzinger in British Columbia, Canada in August 2003. The High Court refused the application, finding that their valid Canadian marriage is, in United Kingdom law, a civil partnership. In this note, I focus on Sir Mark Potter’s adjudication of the human rights issues under Articles 8, 12 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (E.C.H.R.), highlighting his restatement of the ideology of the ‹traditional’ family as natural, normative and desirable. I argue that this case shows that the exclusion of same sex couples from marriage is a feminist issue, because denying same sex couples access to marriage works to sediment patriarchal ideas and re-inscribe gender roles within the family

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Same-Sex Couples and the Marriage Model.Rebecca Probert - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (1):135-143.
Same-Sex Marriage and Equality.Reginald Williams - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):589-595.
Against Marriage and Motherhood.Claudia Card - 1996 - Hypatia 11 (3):1 - 23.
The case against.Margaret Somerville - 2012 - Bioethics Research Notes 24 (2):23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
82 (#203,863)

6 months
19 (#134,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?