Fail better: response to Holland

Journal of Critical Realism 18 (1):83-90 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis is a response to Dominic Holland’s critique of Roy Bhaskar’s posthumous Enlightened Common Sense, which I edited. Holland claims that his critique is immanent, but I argue that it is not, on two interrelated counts: it fails to achieve hermeneutic adequacy; and criticizes Bhaskar’s arguments and positions using mainly transcendent, not immanent, criteria.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Dynamics of Literary Response.Norman N. Holland - 1970 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (2):275-275.
La philosophie et l'agnosticisme.Holland Holland - 1883 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 15:108.
Beginning with God.Robert A. Holland - 1993 - Teaching Philosophy 16 (4):327-334.
Surveying Philosophers: a Response to Kuntz & Kuntz.Wesley Buckwalter - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (4):515-524.
Problems for Moral Twin Earth Arguments.Joshua Gert - 2006 - Synthese 150 (2):171-183.
Is Naturalism Bleak? A Reply to Holland and Cottingham.Ian James Kidd - 2013 - Environmental Values 22 (6):689-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-02

Downloads
13 (#1,032,575)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations