What Do Pronouns and Robots Have in Common? Examining the Subversion of Gender through Case Studies in English Pronouns and Robot Embodiments

Abstract

In this paper, I examine ways to progress towards gender justice and more equitable representations of gender and gender expressions through two case studies: representations of gender in English pronouns and in embodiments of robots. For the pronouns case, I argue that we transition towards using a universal “they” for all modes of communication by adopting the universal “they” in spoken communications and maintaining a variety of pronouns in written communication. “They/them” would serve as a category that does not denote any gender, and 1) weaken the influence and presence of gender in daily conversations and 2) provide the same level of recognition and distinction for people’s gender identities to advance gender justice while we have gender categories. For the robot case, I argue that we should add robots that possess a mix of feminine and masculine features to our current array of robots. This is because we cannot achieve full gender (expression) neutrality in robot appearance like we could for pronouns. We are empirically found to attribute gender to robots even if they are designed to be neutral. So, creating robots that would proliferate the representation of gender (expressions) would be the next best strategy for weakening the role of binary gender norms and for recognizing individuals of nonbinary genders and non-conforming expressions equally with others. I hope these two proposals can serve as a starting point to other facets of gender (expression) representations. We would apply the neutralizing approach for pronouns to cases where undermining gender through the elimination of gender from the conversation is possible. We would apply the mixed-approach for robots to proliferate the representations we have for gender (expression) beyond the binary and weaken the influence of gender in cases where taking gender out altogether is difficult.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

How Much Gender is Too Much Gender?Robin Dembroff & Daniel Wodak - 2021 - In Rebecca Mason (ed.), Hermeneutical Injustice. Routledge. pp. 362-376.
Gender in conditionals.Fabio Del Prete & Alessandro Zucchi - 2021 - Linguistics and Philosophy 44 (4):953–980.
Gender-neutrality and family leave policies.Matthew Cull & Jules Holroyd - 2024 - In Ernest Lepore & Luvell Anderson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Pronouns and Gender.Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini & Michael Glanzberg - 2024 - In Ernest Lepore & Luvell Anderson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Applied Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 265–292.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references