Authors
Michael Hannon
Nottingham University
James Nguyen
Stockholm University
Abstract
What is the epistemic aim of philosophy? The standard view is that philosophy aims to provide true answers to philosophical questions. But if our aim is to settle controversy by answering philosophical questions, our discipline is an embarrassing failure. Moreover, taking philosophy to aim at true answers to such questions leads to a variety of puzzles: How do we account for philosophical expertise? How is philosophical progress possible? Why do job search committees not care about the truth or falsity of a candidate’s philosophical views? We argue that philosophy does not aim at discovering true answers to philosophical questions. Instead, we argue that its primary intellectual aim is understanding, and that many familiar aspects of philosophy become intelligible once we accept this hypothesis.
Keywords understanding  metaphilosophy  truth  knowledge
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Investigations.Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein - 1953 - New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Harvard University Press.
What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
True Enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2017 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
Science, Perception and Reality.Wilfrid Sellars (ed.) - 1963 - New York: Humanities Press.

View all 64 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Recent Work in the Epistemology of Understanding.Michael Hannon - 2021 - American Philosophical Quarterly 58 (3):269-290.
Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge.Kareem Khalifa - 2017 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Scepticism About Philosophy.Jason Brennan - 2010 - Ratio 23 (1):1-16.
Neuroscience, Self-Understanding, and Narrative Truth.Mary Jean Walker - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (4):63-74.
Questions, Answers, and Knowledge- Wh.Meghan Masto - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (3):395-413.
Theory of Knowledge: An Introduction.P. L. Heath & A. D. Woozley - 1951 - Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):278.
Understanding, Truth, and Epistemic Goals.Kareem Khalifa - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (5):944-956.
Epistemic Value.Patrick Bondy - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:0-0.
Idealizations and Scientific Understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-24

Total views
515 ( #17,629 of 2,520,783 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
104 ( #6,784 of 2,520,783 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes