Thought Leader Perspectives on Participant Protections in Precision Medicine Research

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):134-148 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Precision medicine research is rapidly taking a lead role in the pursuit of new ways to improve health and prevent disease, but also presents new challenges for protecting human subjects. The extent to which the current “web” of legal protections, including technical data security measures, as well as measures to restrict access or prevent misuse of research data, will protect participants in this context remains largely unknown. Understanding the strength, usefulness, and limitations of this constellation of laws, regulations, and procedures is critical to ensuring not only that participants are protected, but also that their participation decisions are accurately informed. To address these gaps, we conducted in-depth interviews with a diverse group of 60 thought-leaders to explore their perspectives on the protections associated with precision medicine research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,621

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The importance of animals in biomedical research.Robert W. Leader & Dennis Stark - 1987 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30 (4):470.
The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.
The Precision Medicine Nation.Maya Sabatello & Paul S. Appelbaum - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (4):19-29.
The Return of Results of Deceased Research Participants.Anne Marie Tassé - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):621-630.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-18

Downloads
15 (#800,214)

6 months
3 (#433,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?