Derivation of Einstein's Equation, E= mc 2, from the Classical Force Laws

Apeiron 14 (4):435 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Derivation of∆ E=∆ mc 2 Revisited.Ajay Sharma & His Mercy Enclave - 2011 - Apeiron: Studies in Infinite Nature 18 (3):270.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc 2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
A comment on Mermin's “Understanding Einstein's 1905 derivation of E=mc2”.Hans C. Ohanian - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (3):215-217.
On the Interpretation of the Equation E = mc 2: Reply to Flores.Władysław Krajewski - 2006 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):215-216.
Interpretations of Einstein’s Equation E = mc 2.Francisco Flores - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):245-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-30

Downloads
5 (#847,061)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Julia López
Universidad de Málaga

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references