The sociological deficit of the open society, analyzed and remedied
In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge (1999)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
The open society and its enemies: Authority, community, and bureaucracy.Mark A. Notturno - 1999 - In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
A whiff of Hegel in the open society?John Watkins - 1999 - In I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.), Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
Social foundations of openness.John A. Hall - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):24-38.
Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper.Ian Charles Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.) - 1999 - Routledge.
Dismantling Contemporary Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice.Richard R. Valencia - 2010 - Routledge.
Assumptions of the Deficit Model Type of Thinking: Ignorance, Attitudes, and Science Communication in the Debate on Genetic Engineering in Agriculture. [REVIEW]Marko Ahteensuu - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):295-313.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2009-01-28
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
