Heraclitus and the Riddle of Nature

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):275-286 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a world of expanding epistemological horizons, the Early Greek thinkers known as the Presocratics wrestled with questions concerning the nature of things. But this idea of φύσις as a way to say what things really are was a relatively new one and meant that these thinkers often articulated very different ideas about how to properly under this philosophical concept. In this paper I sketch Heraclitus’s understanding of φύσις as a riddle that demands a particular method of inquiry. Linking many of his fragments, I show that φύσις is a paradoxical harmonia, or “fitting-together,” of opposites that serves as the pattern which underlies all things. Understood in this way, Heraclitus’s frequently mysterious fragments serve as a training ground for building wisdom by testing the listener’s ability to navigate ambiguity and complexity to find hidden meaning. Ultimately for Heraclitus, successfully navigating the riddle of φύσις moves us beyond simply saying “what things are” and unlocks our access to λόγος, or the principle according to which all things are steered or guided.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Concept of the Human Body in Heraclitus.Shawn Loht - forthcoming - Proceedings of the Southeast Philosophy Congress.
Weaving the Fish Basket.Phil Hopkins - 2009 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):209-228.
Moses Maimonides on Job’s Happiness and the Riddle of the Divine Transcendence.N. Verbin - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (4):125--141.
Heraclitus, Plato, and the philosophic dogs.Enrique Hülsz Piccone - 2015 - Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental 15:105-115.
Phusis, Opposites and Ontological Dependence in Heraclitus.Richard Neels - 2018 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 35 (3):199-217.
On the Wording of Heraclitus, Fragment 126.Roman Dilcher - 1994 - Classical Quarterly 44 (01):276–277.
On the Wording of Heraclitus, Fragment 126.Roman Dilcher - 1994 - Classical Quarterly 44 (1):276-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-01

Downloads
30 (#529,972)

6 months
3 (#961,692)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Justin Habash
Ohio State University

Citations of this work

Man and logos: Heraclitus’ secret.A. V. Halapsis - 2020 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 17:119-130.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references