What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature and the Brain [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):867-868 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Centered on the question of normativity and ethics, neuroscientist Jean-Pierre Changeux and philosopher Paul Ricoeur engage in a lively and informative dialogue. They share a common insight concerning ethics, but let us first look at some of their differences.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00346632

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain.Jean-Pierre Changeux & Paul Ricoeur - 2000 - Princeton.
Changeux, Jean-Pierre, and Paul Ricoeur. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature and the Brain. [REVIEW]Paul Gyllenhammer - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):867-868.
Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. [REVIEW]Robert H. Blank - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):69-70.
Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricreur, What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain Reviewed by.Chang-Seong Hong - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (2):102-103.
What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue About Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain.M. B. DeBevoise (ed.) - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain: Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur, translated by M. B. DeBevoise, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2000, x+335 pp., $29.95 , ISBN 0-691-00940-6. [REVIEW]Kenneth Williford - 2005 - Minds and Machines 15 (1):91-97.
Book Review: What Makes Us Think?: A Neuroscientist and a Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. [REVIEW]David Kaplan - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):115-118.
Review of Jean-Pierre Changeux and Paul Ricoeur. 2000. What Makes Us Think? A Neuroscientist and Philosopher Argue about Ethics, Human Nature, and the Brain. [REVIEW]Robert H. Blank - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):69-70.
The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist's Case for the Existence of the Soul.Mario Beauregard & Denyse O'Leary - 2007 - HarperOne.
The Moral Animal: Virtue, Vice, and Human Nature.Christian Miller, Berlin Heather & Shermer Michael - 2016 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:39-56.
Informed Consent in the Human Genome Enterprise.Amnon Goldworth - 1995 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (3):296.
What’s a Brain Supposed to Do?Michael Ferrer - 2002 - Pli 13:225-243.
Consciousness, free action and the brain.John R. Searle - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (10):3-22.
Neuroscience and the Human Mind.Lynne Rudder Baker - unknown
Explaining Virtue from McIntyre's Viewpoint.Zahra Khazaei - unknown2003 - Kheradnameh Sadra Quarterly 33 (3):68-77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
5 (#1,539,211)

6 months
3 (#973,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Gyllenhammer
St. John's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references