The boundaries of pragmatism in Muslim education: Comparing the Islamic pedagogies of Sayyid Qutb and Fethullah Gülen

Critical Research on Religion 8 (3):257-272 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Sayyid Qutb and Fethullah Gülen are two of the most important Muslim leaders and intellectuals of the twentieth century: the two are similar not only for their focus on the relationship between Islam and politics, but also for their lifelong commitments to education. For both Qutb and Gülen, schools were a means through which society itself could be made more just and, ultimately, more Islamic, and for both, their philosophy of education and broader political projects were at once pragmatic and implicitly and explicitly for Qutb contrasted with American pragmatism. Their differing pedagogies are illustrative of their larger visions: for Qutb, Muslim education must be a “total world” in which Islam is protected from secular contagion, while for Gülen, Muslim education can move more slowly through largely secular means. For Gülen, Islam can work outside of and within a secular system; for Qutb, the system must be changed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-20

Downloads
7 (#1,407,052)

6 months
5 (#837,573)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Common Faith.John Dewey - 1934 - Yale University Press.
John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism.Alan Ryan - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (1):103-104.
Globalization and the Politics of Religious Knowledge.Peter Mandaville - 2007 - Theory, Culture and Society 24 (2):101-115.

Add more references