A myth in language teacher learning: Lesson observation

Frontiers in Psychology 13 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This study explores the learning process of 32 Chinese senior high school English as a foreign language teachers via three demonstration lessons. It was demonstrated via a data analysis of oral reports and interviews that the cognitive activity of “question,” which was considered a significant contributor to collaborative discussion, was seldom involved in the participating teachers’ learning process, and that the absence of this cognitive activity reduced their learning to individual study of the observed practical skills. The study further reveals four factors that prevented the participating teachers from collaboratively constructing language teaching knowledge based on what was observed: These were their perceived purpose of the modeled lessons, their manner of making meaning, their understanding of observer–observed relationship, and their perception of professional learning. The analysis presented provides important insights for teacher educators to better facilitate in-service teachers of foreign languages learning through observation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pros and Cons of In-Service Teacher Professional Development via Observation of Filmed Classes.Oren Cohen Zada & Ángeles Bueno Villaverde - 2021 - Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades 10 (1):99-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-21

Downloads
3 (#1,728,901)

6 months
3 (#1,045,901)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Research Methods in Education.L. Cohen, L. Manion & K. Morrison - 2000 - British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (4):446-446.
How We Think.W. B. Pillsbury & John Dewey - 1911 - Philosophical Review 20 (4):441.

Add more references