On Reconciling Biopolitics and Critical Theory

The European Legacy 22 (2):199-209 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines attempts to reconcile biopolitics and Critical Theory, by drawing on Miguel Vatter’s The Republic of the Living. Vatter contends that modern neoliberal government has become biopolitical by incorporating biological life into the calculations of political rationality. To counteract its “normalising” impacts, he recommends an “affirmative politics” of the living, one that escapes the techniques envisaged to administer and govern life. Only a dual approach, he suggests, that fuses both democratic and critical political and economic arguments, can contest neoliberalism. Vatter asserts that the basis of such a critique was first established by the Critical Theory tradition. However, for a biopolitical critique to become effective today, it is crucial to enhance the descriptive and normative understanding of the concept of Zoë or species life within the critical theoretical discourse. This shift in emphasis, however, raises several interpretative tensions with the fundamental perspectives and values of Critical Theory that are not fully acknowledged in Vatter’s proposed reconciliation of biopolitics and Critical Theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-22

Downloads
22 (#732,350)

6 months
10 (#309,337)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Grumley
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

– Ίδ–.Elizabeth Tucker - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (02):205-.
Redemptive and Democratic Paradigms in Radical Politics.Ferenc Feher - 1985 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1985 (63):147-156.

Add more references