Le Trois Modes de Domination et la Mere dans De Cive et _Leviathan_ de Hobbes

In Yves Charles Zarka & Liang Pang (eds.), Hobbes : Le pouvoir entre domination et resistance. Paris, France: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin. pp. 39-57 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While not ignored, the question of the role of mothers in the schema of political rule in Hobbes is not often taken up. Distinct from his contemporaries, Hobbes acknowledges only minimal differences between men and women, and argues that, because maternal protection and nourishment are necessary for its survival, the mother dominates the infant in the state of nature. How to explain that the mother loses this power of domination in the social or political order? Hobbes does not explicitly say. However, some possibilities can be extracted from his texts. Here, I will attempt to explain the loss of maternal power by examining Hobbes's discourse on the different modes of dominion and political rule in "De Cive" and "Leviathan." I will concentrate on their differences, drawing from Yves Charles Zarka's reading of them. Then I will approach the question of the mother and her position in the hierarchy of servitude in each of these texts, appealing to Carole Pateman's analyses as well as Zarka's. Finally, I will present what role the mother's dominion over her children plays in Hobbes's schema.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition.Daniela Gobetti (ed.) - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
I Professed to Write Not All to All.Eva Helene Odzuck - 2017 - Hobbes Studies 30 (2):123-155.
What is the Leviathan?Paul Sagar - 2018 - Hobbes Studies 31 (1):75-92.
Hobbes on Power and Gender Relations.Sandra Leonie Field - 2021 - In Marcus P. Adams (ed.), A Companion to Hobbes. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 139–155.
Leviathan, Parts I and Ii - Revised Edition.A. P. Martinich & Brian Battiste (eds.) - 2010 - Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press.
Le désir dans l’approche contractualiste hobbesienne.Marc-Kevin Daoust - 2015 - In Daoust Marc-Kevin (ed.), Le désir et la philosophie. Les Cahiers D'Ithaque. pp. 97-109.
Hobbes, History, and Non-domination.Alan Cromartie - 2009 - Hobbes Studies 22 (2):171-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
304 (#66,756)

6 months
153 (#21,869)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Griffith
Middle East Technical University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references