Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):527-542 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who blows the whistle — a loner or a well-liked team player? Which of them is more likely to lead a successful opposition to perceived organizational wrongdoing? The potential influence of co-worker pressures to conform on whistle-blowing activity or the likely effects of whistle-blowing on the group have not been addressed. This paper presents a preliminary model of whistle-blowing as an act of nonconformity. One implication is that the success of an opposition will depend on the characteristics of the whistle-blower and how the complaint is pursued. Specific hypotheses and general suggestions for future research and practice are offered

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Identification and Protection of Corporate Whistle-blowers: A Legal Perspective.Naheeda Ali & Kanwal Iqbal Khan - 2022 - Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies 8 (1):123-134.
Whistle-Blowing and Morality.Mathieu Bouville - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):579-585.
Is Whistle-blowing Compatible with Employee Loyalty?Jukka Varelius - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2):263-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
64 (#247,010)

6 months
12 (#304,552)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Informal social communication.Leon Festinger - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (5):271-282.
Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.E. P. Hollander - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (2):117-127.

Add more references