Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workers [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):527-542 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who blows the whistle — a loner or a well-liked team player? Which of them is more likely to lead a successful opposition to perceived organizational wrongdoing? The potential influence of co-worker pressures to conform on whistle-blowing activity or the likely effects of whistle-blowing on the group have not been addressed. This paper presents a preliminary model of whistle-blowing as an act of nonconformity. One implication is that the success of an opposition will depend on the characteristics of the whistle-blower and how the complaint is pursued. Specific hypotheses and general suggestions for future research and practice are offered

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
12 (#200,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Informal social communication.Leon Festinger - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (5):271-282.
Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit.E. P. Hollander - 1958 - Psychological Review 65 (2):117-127.

Add more references