The Integrity of Scottish Philosophy and the Idea of a National Tradition

In Scottish Philosophy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This concluding chapter addresses the conceptual questions that arise in connection with identifying a philosophical tradition, and giving it a distinctive national label. It argues against the common identification of ‘Scottish philosophy’ with the ‘School of Common Sense’, and argues that Francis Hutcheson initiated an approach to philosophical questions that pre-dates the appeal to common sense developed by Reid. It contends that the ‘School of Common Sense’ was just one attempt to formulate a satisfactory response to David Hume. By examining the work of Andrew Seth and Henry Jones, it explores the idea of a shared philosophical agenda, and argues that a common project rooted in a long-standing institutional framework is what sustained the Scottish philosophical intellectual tradition. The chapter ends by considering the factors that may be said to have brought that tradition to an end.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
2 (#1,820,763)

6 months
2 (#1,445,320)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gordon Graham
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references