Different vulnerabilities for addiction may contribute to the same phenomena and some additional interactions

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):445-446 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The framework for addiction offered by the target article can perhaps be simplified into fewer, more basic, vulnerabilities. covers a number of vulnerabilities, not just enhanced delay discounting. Real-world drug-use decisions involve both delay and probability discounting. The motivational salience of, and attentional bias for, drug cues may be related to a number of vulnerabilities. Interactions among vulnerabilities are of significance and complicate the application of this framework

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Negative affects are parts of the addiction syndrome.Michel Le Moal - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):451-452.
Social influence and vulnerability.Joseph M. Boden - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):442-443.
The elephantine shape of addiction.Henry Yin - 2008 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (4):461-461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
37 (#421,253)

6 months
11 (#338,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references