Intention and Representation: Searle's 'Internal' Thesis

Literature & Aesthetics 2:53-66 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to Goodrich on the Antirrhetic.Richard Weisberg - 1992 - Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 4 (2):237-242.
Comments on Kevelson and Goodrich.Charles Yablon - 1992 - Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 4 (2):223-225.
Künstliche Intelligenz und Philosophie: Zur Debatte um J. R. Searle's Einwände gegen harte KI-Versionen.Eduard Zwierlein - 1990 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (2):347-358.
Origins of American Scientists: A Study Made under the Direction of a Committee of the Faculty of Wesleyan University by R. H. Knapp; H. B. Goodrich. [REVIEW]Edward Lurie - 1953 - Isis 44:403-404.
Intention and interpretation in literature.A. J. Ellis - 1974 - British Journal of Aesthetics 14 (4):315-325.
Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. By Peter Goodrich.I. M. Jarvad - 1999 - The European Legacy 4:100-100.
Representation in Literature.James Young - 1999 - Literature & Aesthetics 9:127-143.
Die Starke KI-These: Zu Searle's Wiederbelebung einer fragwürdigen Debatte über die Grundlagen des Erkenntnisprogramms der Erforschung Künstlicher Intelligenz.Stephan Zelewski - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (2):337-348.
Representation in Literature.Colin Lyas - 2000 - In Ananta Charana Sukla (ed.), Art and Representation: Contributions to Contemporary Aesthetics. Westport, CT, USA: Praeger. pp. 175.
On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle’s Notion of an ‘Institutional Fact’: Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” (Analyse & Kritik 20, 149-158). [REVIEW]Carsten Heidemann - 1999 - Analyse & Kritik 21 (2):251-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
1 (#1,722,932)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references