- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Complexity revisited
Biology and Philosophy 32 (3):467-479 (2017)
Abstract
I look back at my 1996 book Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature, responding to papers by Pamela Lyon, Fred Keijzer and Argyris Arnellos, and Matt Grove.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Copredication and Complexity Revisited: A Reply to Löhr and Michel.Elliot Murphy - 2022 - Cognitive Science 46 (10):e13207.
Copredication and Complexity Revisited: Reply to Murphy's Reply.Christian Michel & Guido Löhr - 2023 - Cognitive Science 47 (2):e13249.
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. [REVIEW]Paul Raymont - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17 (1):35-38.
Peter Godfrey-Smith, Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature.J. S. McIntosh - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (1):95-99.
Review. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Peter Godfrey-Smith. [REVIEW]D. M. Walsh - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):613-617.
Review. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Peter Godfrey-Smith.D. M. Walsh - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):613-617.
Ruth Garrett Millikan, Review of Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature by Peter Godfrey-Smith. [REVIEW]Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1998 - Philosophy of Science 65 (2):375-377.
Where does thinking come from? A commentary on Peter Godfrey-Smith's complexity and the function of mind in nature.Kim Sterelny - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):551-566.
Review: Peter Godfrey-Smith. Philosophy of Biology. [REVIEW]Cailin O’Connor - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (4):731-733.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-03-18
Downloads
72 (#79,783)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
2017-03-18
Downloads
72 (#79,783)
6 months
8 (#1,326,708)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Complexity and the Evolution of Consciousness.Walter Veit - 2023 - Biological Theory 18 (3):175-190.
Thinking embodiment with genetics: epigenetics and postgenomic biology in embodied cognition and enactivism.Maurizio Meloni & Jack Reynolds - 2020 - Synthese 198 (11):10685-10708.
Argumentation Evolved: But How? Coevolution of Coordinated Group Behavior and Reasoning.Fabian Seitz - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (2):237-260.
A Mind Selected by Needs: Explaining Logical Animals by Evolution.Fabian Seitz - 2020 - Acta Analytica 35 (4):579-597.
References found in this work
Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Richard W. Byrne & Andrew Whiten (eds.) - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature.Peter Godfrey-Smith (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Individuality, subjectivity, and minimal cognition.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2016 - Biology and Philosophy 31 (6):775-796.
Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans.Richard W. Byrne & Andrew Whiten - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (1):73-75.
Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2001 - In Robert J. Sternberg & James C. Kaufman (eds.), The Evolution of Intelligence. Lawrence Erlbaum. pp. 233--249.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-594f89468-cz52b uwo