Categorization of Investigation: Defining the Ethical Questions

Research Ethics 2 (1):15-18 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper draws attention to a simple distinction that, when ignored, considerably distorts discussion of what should be subject to what form of ethical review and by whom. The distinction is between two types of ethical questions that can be asked about any investigation, and indeed about many other types of activity. First, there are questions of the kind: Is it ethical to conduct this investigation at all? Second, there are questions such as: How can this investigation be conducted in an ethical way? Consideration of these questions and of the categorization of research based on study design can lead to a model for triage, however the aim of the paper is not so much to make a real practical suggestion but rather the to highlight the distinction between two types of ethical question. It is clear thinking on the relationship between the two types of question that might lead to some practical suggestions and serve to better define the scope of research ethics review.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Business ethics: Micro and macro. [REVIEW]James Brummer - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (2):81 - 91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-21

Downloads
8 (#517,646)

6 months
15 (#941,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Correspondence.[author unknown] - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):111-114.
Editorial.Roger Rawbone - 2008 - Research Ethics 4 (2):45-46.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references