What is right with 'bayes net methods' and what is wrong with 'hunting causes and using them'?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):161-211 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Nancy Cartwright's recent criticisms of efforts and methods to obtain causal information from sample data using automated search are considered. In addition to reviewing that effort, I argue that almost all of her criticisms are false and rest on misreading, overgeneralization, or neglect of the relevant literature



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

114 (#110,885)

6 months
3 (#224,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University