What is right with 'bayes net methods' and what is wrong with 'hunting causes and using them'?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):161-211 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Nancy Cartwright's recent criticisms of efforts and methods to obtain causal information from sample data using automated search are considered. In addition to reviewing that effort, I argue that almost all of her criticisms are false and rest on misreading, overgeneralization, or neglect of the relevant literature

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-13

Downloads
114 (#110,885)

6 months
3 (#224,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clark Glymour
Carnegie Mellon University