Horrendous Evil and the Loving God: a Reply to Joshua Thurow

Sophia 61 (2):419-428 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marilyn McCord Adams has defended theodicy by appeal to the idea of post-mortem compensation for the victims of horrendous evil. I have argued that this overlooks the dissociation of theodicy from moral reality that she concedes in her response to criticism of theodicy by D Z Phillips. Joshua Thurow has recently defended Adams against my argument. Here I defend and strengthen that argument against Thurow.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine intimacy and the problem of horrendous evil.Dennis Earl - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (1):17-28.
Why God allows undeserved horrendous evil.Scott Hill - 2022 - Religious Studies 58 (4):772-786.
Horrendous evils and the goodness of God.Marilyn McCord Adams - 1989 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray.
Defeasible a priori justification: A reply to Thurow.Albert Casullo - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):336–343.
Evil, Meaning and Meaning-Makers.Daniel Ambord - 2010 - Ars Disputandi 10:38-49.
Horrendous evils and the goodness of God.Philip L. Quinn - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):476-479.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-04

Downloads
34 (#467,803)

6 months
12 (#209,539)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Gleeson
Flinders University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations