Quantum theory and the identity of indiscernibles revisited

Philosophy of Science 48 (3):487-491 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I defend the claim that quantum theory, Specifically quantum field theory (qft), Is incompatible with leibniz's principle of the identity of indiscernibles. This is in response to r. Barnette's criticism ("philosophy of science" 45:466-470) of an argument given by alberto cortes ("philosophy of science" 43:491-505) intended to establish this claim. I show that, Using the qft point of view, Cortes' argument can be restated in a way that leaves it immune to barnette's criticism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How to take particle physics seriously: A further defence of axiomatic quantum field theory.Doreen Fraser - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (2):126-135.
Philosophical foundations of quantum field theory.N. Huggett - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):617-637.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#262,070)

6 months
12 (#304,463)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles.Steven French & Michael Redhead - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):233-246.
Discerning Fermions.Simon Saunders & F. A. Muller - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):499 - 548.
Schrödinger Logics.Newton C. A. da Costa & Décio Krause - 1994 - Studia Logica 53 (4):533-550.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations