Do we need fixed methodological principles?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (2):329-334 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Value-neutrality and criticism.Gerhard Zecha - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (1):153-164.
Comparing fixed-point and revision theories of truth.Philip Kremer - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):363-403.
Some unifying fixed point principles.Raymond M. Smullyan - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (1):129 - 141.
Yet another hierarchy theorem.Max Kubierschky - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):627-640.
Understanding bias in scientific practice.Nancy E. Shaffer - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
42 (#376,178)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Between epistemology and hermeneutics.Dimitri Ginev - 1995 - Science & Education 4 (2):147-159.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science and Values.Harold I. Brown & Larry Laudan - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (3):439.
Normative naturalism.Larry Laudan - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):44-59.
Aim-less epistemology?Larry Laudan - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (2):315-322.
The value of a fixed methodology. [REVIEW]John Worrall - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):263-275.

View all 7 references / Add more references