Why did bloodletting decline? [Book Review]

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):433-434 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.04.002

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Change of type as an explanation for the decline of therapeutic bloodletting.K. Codell Carter - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (1):1-11.
Why did attachment stick?Georgina M. Montgomery - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 60:102-104.
Why epigenetics is not a vindication of Lamarckism – and why that matters.Ute Deichmann - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:80-82.
Book in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.[author unknown] - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33 (3):565-566.
Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 67:ii.
Why there might not be an evolutionary explanation for psychological altruism.Stephen Stich - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:3-6.
The Principle of Stasis: Why drift is not a Zero-Cause Law.Victor J. Luque - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57:71-79.
Editorial Board.[author unknown] - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 68:ii.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science part c: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.[author unknown] - 1997 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 28 (4):V.
Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models.Cameron Shelley - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):292-299.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
16 (#903,180)

6 months
16 (#218,426)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Donald Gillies
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references