The Mark of Responsibility

Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2):157-171 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper tackles three common misconceptions about responsibility. The first misconception is that it is against our interests to be responsible for our actions. The second is that our responsibility for our actions is fixed at the time when we act. The third is that we can only be responsible to someone in particular, not responsible full stop. The three misconceptions turn out to be related, and disabusing ourselves of them helps us to rediscover the most fundamental point of the courtroom trial

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
71 (#230,886)

6 months
31 (#105,249)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Gardner
James Madison University

References found in this work

Solidarity or Objectivity?Richard Rorty - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 367-380.

Add more references