- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Dependent arising and the emptiness of emptiness: Why did nāgārjuna start with causation?
Philosophy East and West 44 (2):219-250 (1994)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Emptiness in the Pali Suttas and the Question of Nagarjuna's Orthodoxy.Abraham Vélez de Cea - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (4):507-528.
Emptiness in the Pali Suttas and the Question of Nagarjuna's Orthodoxy.Abraham Velez de Cea - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (4):507-528.
Dependent arising and the emptiness.Jay L. Garfield - 1994 - Philosophy East and West 44 (2):219-250.
A reply to Garfield and Westerhoff on "acquiring emptiness".Douglas L. Berger - 2011 - Philosophy East and West 61 (2):368-372.
Review of The Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā by Jay L. Garfield. [REVIEW]Dan Arnold - 1999 - Philosophy East and West 49 (1):88-92.
Review of Empty Words: Buddhist Philosophy and Cross-Cultural Interpretation by Jay L. Garfield. [REVIEW]Mario D'Amato - 2003 - Philosophy East and West 53 (1):136-139.
On Nāgārjuna's Ontological and Semantic Paradox.Koji Tanaka - 2016 - Philosophy East and West 66 (4):1292-1306.
A Comment on" The Way of the Dialetheist: Contradictions in Buddhism," by Yasuo Deguchi, Jay L. Garfield, and Graham Priest.Brook Ziporyn - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (3):344-352.
Dependent Arising and Emptiness: A Tibetan Buddhist interpretation of Madhyamika philosophy emphasising the compatability of emptiness and conventional phenomena. Elizabeth Napper.Paul Williams - 1993 - Buddhist Studies Review 10 (2):253-258.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
445 (#46,328)
6 months
19 (#181,267)
2009-01-28
Downloads
445 (#46,328)
6 months
19 (#181,267)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Bateson's Process Ontology for Psychological Practice.Julien Tempone Wiltshire & Traill Dowie - 2023 - Process Studies 52 (1):95–116.
Causation and emptiness in early madhyamaka.Mark Siderits - 2004 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 32 (4):393-419.
A Criticism of M. Siderits and J. L. Garfield’s ‘Semantic Interpretation’ of Nāgārjuna’s Theory of Two Truths.Giuseppe Ferraro - 2013 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (2):195-219.
Buddhist Perspectives on Free Will: Agentless Agency?Rick Repetti (ed.) - 2016 - London, UK: Routledge / Francis & Taylor.
Mentalese not spoken here: Computation, cognition and causation.Jay L. Garfield - 1997 - Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):413-35.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo