The CLASH model lacks evolutionary and archeological support

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Data from archaeology and paleoanthropology directly challenge the validity of the basic assumptions of the CLASH model. By not incorporating a “deep time” perspective, the hypothesis lacks the evolutionary baseline the authors seek to infer in validating the model.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is echo a complex adaptive system?Mark Bedau - 2000 - Evolutionary Computation 8 (4):419-442.
A Clash Or Dialogue Of Civilizations? A “Medieval” Or “Modern” Mentality.Leonard Swidler - 2006 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 5 (13):59-67.
The argument from almost indiscernibles.Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3005-3020.
A behavior-analytic developmental model is better.Gary Novak & Martha Peláez - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):466-468.
Evolutionary synthesis: A search for the strategy.Juha Tuomi - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):429-438.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
19 (#799,653)

6 months
4 (#790,347)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references