- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A criterion for coarse iterability
Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (4):447-467 (2010)
Abstract
The main result of this paper is the following theorem: Let M be a premouse with a top extender, F. Suppose that (a) M is linearly coarsely iterable via hitting F and its images, and (b) if M * is a linear iterate of M as in (a), then M * is coarsely iterable with respect to iteration trees which do not use the top extender of M * and its images. Then M is coarsely iterableAuthor's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
The self-iterability of L[E].Ralf Schindler & John Steel - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (3):751-779.
Core Models in the Presence of Woodin Cardinals.Ralf Schindler - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (4):1145 - 1154.
Large cardinals and iteration trees of height ω.Alessandro Andretta - 1991 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 54 (1):1-15.
Inner models with large cardinal features usually obtained by forcing.Arthur W. Apter, Victoria Gitman & Joel David Hamkins - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):257-283.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal.Spencer Unger - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):483-496.
A weak Dodd-Jensen lemma.Itay Neeman & John Steel - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1285-1294.
Large cardinals and definable well-orders on the universe.Andrew D. Brooke-Taylor - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):641-654.
Some applications of coarse inner model theory.Greg Hjorth - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):337-365.
The fine structure of real mice.Daniel W. Cunningham - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (3):937-994.
Iterability and the order-word plateau: 'A politics of the performative' in Derrida and deleuze/guattari.C. J. - 2003 - Critical Horizons 4 (2):227-264.
Proper forcing and l(ℝ).Itay Neeman & Jindřich Zapletal - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (2):801-810.
Extender based forcings.Moti Gitik & Menachem Magidor - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):445-460.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-23
Downloads
67 (#242,647)
6 months
33 (#103,115)
2013-11-23
Downloads
67 (#242,647)
6 months
33 (#103,115)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Mice with finitely many Woodin cardinals from optimal determinacy hypotheses.Sandra Müller, Ralf Schindler & W. Hugh Woodin - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (Supp01):1950013.
Mice with finitely many Woodin cardinals from optimal determinacy hypotheses.Sandra Müller, Ralf Schindler & W. Hugh Woodin - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (Supp01):1950013.
Woodin's axiom , bounded forcing axioms, and precipitous ideals on ω 1.Benjamin Claverie & Ralf Schindler - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (2):475-498.
Stacking mice.Ronald Jensen, Ernest Schimmerling, Ralf Schindler & John Steel - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (1):315-335.
The consistency strength of long projective determinacy.Juan P. Aguilera & Sandra Müller - 2019 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 85 (1):338-366.
References found in this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-zf4z4 uwo